Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Or the Zeiss Planar - Re: [Leica] Seeking a new 50
From: masonster at gmail.com (David Mason)
Date: Fri Mar 25 10:45:11 2005
References: <4243EE02.9070007@adrenaline.com> <4243EEBC.4000504@adrenaline.com> <02bb01c53150$47137790$1ae76c18@ted> <42445492.8050003@adrenaline.com>

I paid $100 for my Summi-Jupiter10-lux.

If I pull on the aperture ring I can actually make the front portion
of the lens turn like a PC lens.

Well worth the money.


On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:12:34 -0500, Scott McLoughlin
<scott@adrenaline.com> wrote:
> You know, I've never considerd the legendary Noctilux. Maybe
> I should. Pricey though, yes?
> 
> Scott
>

In reply to: Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Seeking a new 50)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) (Or the Zeiss Planar - Re: [Leica] Seeking a new 50)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) (Or the Zeiss Planar - Re: [Leica] Seeking a new 50)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) (Or the Zeiss Planar - Re: [Leica] Seeking a new 50)