Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Feli is correct, but I don't think it would be a mistake. I've used a 35 for years on an M3 without the goggles. But then I am not that critical about frame edges. And the 3 is a nice piece of work. bill h ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael J Herring" <creativevisions@verizon.net> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 8:00 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica M3 purchase > Thanks! > I am leaning toward a 35mm as my first lens. > However, this would be a mistake to use with the M3. > Correct? > > Thanks to all, > Mike > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Feli" <feli2@earthlink.net> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> > Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 3:19 AM > Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica M3 purchase > > >> Used with meter: >> M6 or M6TTL $1300-1500 >> MP (demo) $2300 >> >> Used no meter: >> M4 $1000-1500 (add $250 for a CLA) >> M2 $ 800-1400 (add $250 for a CLA) >> >> New: >> MP (black) >> >> If I could only have one lens it would be a 35. >> >> >> feli >> >> >> On Apr 4, 2005, at 8:11 PM, Michael J Herring wrote: >>> OK, Gents. What would you consider a fair price and which body would > you >>> purchase yourselves? >>> Thanks for the responses, >>> Mike >> ________________________________________________________ >> feli2@earthlink.net 2 + 2 = 4 www.elanphotos.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > -- > I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. > It has removed 367 spam emails to date. > Paying users do not have this message in their emails. > Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now! > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information