Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] dng
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Wed Apr 13 17:12:01 2005
References: <89ba028892884e6809ac99d08ccface6@charter.net> <000001c54084$6a65bbc0$6401a8c0@dorysrusp4>

I have heard this also - I've converted a batch of my D1s images to
DNG to see how it went - not real fast and no size difference to speak
of. So for right now I don't see a reason to change.

Adam

On 4/13/05, Don Dory <dorysrus@mindspring.com> wrote:
> I thought that the DMR had accepted the DNG.  I could be wrong.
> 
> Don
> dorysrus@mindspring.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf
> Of leo
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 6:00 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: [Leica] dng
> 
> Anyone embraced the adobe dng format?  Thoughts?
> 
> Leo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from leowesson at charter.net (leo) ([Leica] dng)
Message from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] dng)