Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used
From: feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli)
Date: Mon Apr 25 16:17:06 2005
References: <BE91D7B4.13FB3%mark@rabinergroup.com> <c792ee633a422e758b8f34adaf0f5b48@earthlink.net> <12493c12635e81e553ca25ccec54b180@bradbrad.com>

On Apr 25, 2005, at 3:59 PM, brad daly wrote:

> from the description of his cameras in the new yorker story, it seemed 
> clear to me they were 67s.


There has been a running series on the project in the Guardian for the 
past few months.
They specifically mention the 645, but perhaps he is using both?

feli


________________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                     2 + 2 = 4                      
www.elanphotos.com


Replies: Reply from brad at bradbrad.com (brad daly) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)
Message from brad at bradbrad.com (brad daly) ([Leica] (was Coenen) now: buying Leica new vs. used)