Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/04/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: 35mm film cameras
From: feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli)
Date: Mon Apr 25 16:28:32 2005
References: <PAEILMJJLHOMKKEJDDKICECACLAA.bonvini@optonline.net>

On Apr 25, 2005, at 4:03 PM, Jay wrote:

> Running hot was one of the issues for Kodak to step away - as they 
> replaced
> the monitors when they went away. Costly.

Yeah, bad idea.

> So, you were at DD for a while, Scott is an old friend of mine from 
> the SF
> Bay area days.

When Scott ran ILM? Scott was my first boss in 'the biz'. I see him 
every
once and a while when I go down there, but he's very busy these days
with development. I left DD about a year and a half ago, but I still 
like the place
and am very proud of the work the company did.


> Can't remember the lead compositor's name - used to be at CIS - his 
> business
> card read "visionaut".

Price Pethel? The man who's forgotten more about compositing than most 
people know?
Nuke is his brain child. After he left other people drove it's 
development, like Jonathan Egstad
and Bill Spitzak.

> Never did get a chance to play with Nuke, but did like Shake - even 
> though
> it seems to be going the all Apple way

You would like Nuke. It makes most other packages look like a toy.

> .Are they having problems selling that package?


Shake or Nuke? Nuke went commercial about 2 years ago and is slowly
gaining momentum. Apple cut off Shake for Windows. They are really only
supporting it for OS X and Linux. The biggest problem is cost. Both 
packages
are rather expensive, which limits their mass appeal.


feli

________________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                     2 + 2 = 4                      
www.elanphotos.com


Replies: Reply from bonvini at optonline.net (Jay) ([Leica] OT: 35mm film cameras)
In reply to: Message from bonvini at optonline.net (Jay) ([Leica] OT: 35mm film cameras)