Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] PAW 20 Millenium Bridge and St. Paul's - Try this!!
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Tue May 17 17:48:45 2005
References: <4289F4EB.3090809@summaventures.com> <4289F66A.1080407@gmx.de> <428A64F5.2080904@summaventures.com>
 
Peter Dzwig offered:

> see which one you you think is straight...
> > http://gallery.leica-users.org/album164/MilleniumBridge200505
> > the original
>
> or:
> > http://gallery.leica-users.org/album164/MilleniumBridge200505Rot1

Hi Peter,
I thought you posted the same picture without any correction! ;-) That was 
to test our seeing ability. However, I see there is a tiny bit of correction 
which at the time of the original post it never caught my eye as I thought 
it was a neat shot right off.

Does the correction make that much difference? Naw it's till one of those 
neat photos that work one way or the other. :-)

ted
Replies: Reply from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] PAW 20 Millenium Bridge and St. Paul's - Try this!!)
 In reply to: Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] PAW 20 Millenium Bridge and St. Paul's)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] PAW 20 Millenium Bridge and St. Paul's)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] PAW 20 Millenium Bridge and St. Paul's - Try this!!)