Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]True, Feli - And isn't just astounding the percentage of people who, given those 10 stops, turn out such crap? ;-) On 5/24/05 1:34 PM, "Feli" <feli2@earthlink.net> wrote: > > On May 24, 2005, at 10:26 AM, B. D. Colen wrote: > >> Yup. And what about not having time to get that perfectly exposed >> image to >> which Frank referred - so the exposure's off a bit, and the film's the >> wrong >> type? So you fiddle with the development, which gives you a >> compromise, and >> then you've still got that less-than-perfect exposure. The reality is >> that >> in that kind of situation, digital can save the day. > > Well, considering how much exposure range film has (10 stops vs. > digital's 6 stops) > you would really have the screw things up pretty well, to not get > acceptable results. > I've pulled stuff out of negatives in Photoshop and other software that > would surprise > you. > > And if all fails, just blame the lab. > ;-) > > Feli > > > ________________________________________________________ > feli2@earthlink.net 2 + 2 = 4 www.elanphotos.com > > > no archive > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information