Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/05/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:Second thoughts about digitals
From: max_weisenfeld at verizon.net (Max Weisenfeld)
Date: Sat May 28 14:52:40 2005
References: <20050528053628.MWGP1130.maxwell2.pacific.net.sg@smtp.pacific.net.sg>

Yes, but I bet if you find your Dad's old hard drive in a closet in 2056, 
you won't be able to do this with the files:

http://www.leica-gallery.net/max3/image-84250.html


Max


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <kelvinlee@pacific.net.sg>
To: <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 1:36 AM
Subject: [Leica] Re:Second thoughts about digitals


>
> Digital cameras are best really, for people who actually use their 
> cameras.
> Not great for people who otherwise shoot 2 rolls a year, who should then
> stick to film.
>
> What is the real cost of running a film camera?
> Assume you shoot 10 rolls of film a week. That's 52 rolls a year. Assume
> film+process is about US$5/roll (conservatively). That's US$2600 a year.
>
> Will your DSLR depreciate $2600 a year? For most people who use a EOS 10D
> or 20D , probably not. ... so the savings in film+process often makes up 
> for
> the depreciation.
>
> Furthermore, I find I shoot more with digitals than I did w/ film.
>
> You can't do a 1:1 comparison b/n film and digital ... because the running
> cost of film camera is actually higher in comparison, for people who 
> actually
> use their cameras regularly.
>
>
>
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 20:20:33 -0400
> From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@comcast.net>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Second thoughts about digitals
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Message-ID: <BEBD3191.A48%bdcolen@comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Of course $650 was a very low price for a good M3 10 years ago. In fact, 
> it
> was low for a good M3 three or four years ago. Had you bought a good M3
> just
> 5 years ago, you'd undoubtedly lose money on it if you sold it today. And
> certainly that's the case for M6s, M7s, and M4s. Although all have held on
> to far, far more of their value than the high-end digital cameras. ;-)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 


Replies: Reply from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Re:Second thoughts about digitals)
In reply to: Message from kelvinlee at pacific.net.sg (kelvinlee@pacific.net.sg) ([Leica] Re:Second thoughts about digitals)