Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Erwin's Latest
From: bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Tue Jun 14 12:12:49 2005

I will freely admit to preferring primes on aesthetic grounds - I too want
to zoom with my feet. But I don't have that option with the E-1, and I've
found that the zooms produce excellent images. The trick is not to let the
zoom make you lazy.


On 6/14/05 12:42 PM, "Scott McLoughlin" <scott@adrenaline.com> wrote:

> My problem with zooms is that they're mostly pretty big, and they
> seem to confound me composition wise. With primes, I find I start
> moving my feet, and once I get moving, I'll work a composition more.
> I'll also start to "see" the world through a focal length or two, helping
> me "pre-visualize" my shots (sorry for that loaded term).
> 
> I just got a wide zoom for my D70, and after some initial confusion
> and experimentation, I find I now just use it like two primes: 24mm
> and around 14mm, i.e., equiv. to a ~35mm and ~21mm in 135 format.
> 
> Scott
> 
> B. D. Colen wrote:
> 
>> MPs and the Aspheric lens lineup!' The reality is that today's Canon, 
>> Nikon,
>> and, yes, Olympus Zooms are, by and large, optically superior to the 
>> lenses
>> HCB used for most of his career - even if they aren't as good as Leica M
>> aspherical beauties. It still comes down to the image - the elements that
>> make up the photo, that draw people to it, that bring the viewer
>> information, that inspire the viewer to think.
>> 
>>  
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re: Erwin's Latest)