Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/06/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Erwin's Latest
From: creativevisions at verizon.net (Michael J Herring)
Date: Wed Jun 15 17:28:20 2005
References: <200506140029.j5E0PARG008614@server1.waverley.reid.org> <000601c570a1$84ce8620$4f7bea04@oemcomputer>

There is a vast difference between being fortunate enough to have the vast
choices and the fact that so many photographers are obsessive about these
technical aspects.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Montie Talbert" <montoid@earthlink.net>
To: <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 1:25 AM
Subject: [Leica] Re: Erwin's Latest


>> I think B.D. hit the nail on the head- getting"a
>>meaningful image". After taking a class in the History
>>of Photography I came away with that conclusion.
>>The photogs were not using the equip that we have
>>available- and they made impressive images. Stasys
>
>> On Jun 13, 2005, at 7:22 AM, B. D. Colen wrote:
>>As to the comments about the Canon lenses -
>
>>It's not that photographers won't "notice," it's that real
>>photographers know it just doesn't matter - what matters
>>is getting a meaningful image, not the technical accomplishment
>>of getting the woof and weave in the pants someone in the shot
>>is wearing. And that's true even if one is shooting birds or bats
>>or flowers - unless one is doing the shooting as part of
>>scientific research. ;-)
>
> I think B.D. missed the nail and hit his thumb!  "Real
> photographers" know that it DOES matter!!  It's all
> about choices as today we have "tools" available to meet
> just about any imaging requirement imaginable. The "Real
> photographer" selects the appropriate gear to match the
> subject, assignment, or theme at hand.  If I'm a product,
> advertising, fashion, or commercial photog who wants (or needs)
> to get the "woof and weave in the pants someone is wearing"
> I know that today I can do that, and when my prints are done,
> I seriously doubt they would qualify as "scientific research",
> hopefully just a happy client.  If I'm a fine art guy, maybe just
> a pin hole body cap on my nikkormat might suffice for the
> "meaningful image" I'm after.  The Point?  The science and
> engineering of photographic tools has evolved to create a vast
> arsenal and many, many more choices...and that's a good thing!
>
> Montie
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 371 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!



In reply to: Message from montoid at earthlink.net (Montie Talbert) ([Leica] Re: Erwin's Latest)