Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] My barber
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Wed Aug 24 10:11:25 2005
References: <4cfa589b05082320415d4296ff@mail.gmail.com><025801c5a8b3$cacd6d40$0400a8c0@robertbxucevjs> <4cfa589b05082409131c73452d@mail.gmail.com>

Adam,

I certainly wasn't suggesting pushing Tri-X.   I was suggesting using Tri-X 
at 400 and the appropriate exposure, which would have been f2.8 at 1/100. 
That would look worlds better than what, at least on my screen, you got.

Bob

> Robert - I'm not so sure that pushed two stops Tri-X would have been
> better, at least not in my hands. I like the look of Tri-X - but my
> experience and doing my own chemstry makes me feel that it would not
> have worked as well.
>
> However, as Don pointed out, using my 50 Summicron at f2.8 would have
> given a very nice result as well.
>
> I do appreciate the feedback from everyone and I hope to use it to
> make better images in the future!
>
> Thank you!
>
> Adam
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] My barber)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] My barber)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] My barber)