Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]For once, Greg, why don't you try responding to the argument, rather than only engage in ad homonym attacks? On 8/25/05 12:21 PM, "GREG LORENZO" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca> wrote: > george lottermoser writes in part: > >>> That brings us back once again to the suggestion that if Leica is to >>> have a >>> future, that future probably lies in producing lenses in Canon and Nikon >>> mounts, or selling Leica lenses with red dotted Canon and Nikon >>> adapters, rather than wasting money on trying to produce digital >>> backs for a tiny handful of diehard fans. >> >> B.D. - I have no idea what the future of Leica, Leaf, Imacon, >> Sinar, or any other 'high-end' camera/digital/back mfg's may be. >> Apparently >> they're all shuffling to figure it out. They're tools >> that may or may not work for you. They have nothing to do with >> 'die-hard' brand loyalty. Your constant background drone of what sounds >> like >> anti-leica mantras really does little to help our understanding of what is >> going on technically - be it optical, digital, mechanical, electronic or >> otherwise. >> -- > > Apparently we're supposed to all be greatly impressed by this kind of > continuous anti-Leica ranting and raving, which has continued for at least > the > last 3 years on the list, because the poser posts a PAW. I believe most > people > are more impressed by what you ARE rather than what you POST. > > I'm not impressed at all by people who continually shout 'FIRE!' in a > crowded > theatre. > > Regards, > > Greg > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information