Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Catching up with the PAW: weeks 31 to 33
From: ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Sat Aug 27 15:38:36 2005
References: <BF36B5F9.5000%philippe.orlent@pandora.be>

Was the color really different or did a scanner's auto-opinion change  
from scan to scan?

I see that pretty often on commercially scanned stuff.

Ric Carter
http://gallery.leica-users.org/Passing-Fancies

On Aug 27, 2005, at 6:29 PM, Philippe Orlent wrote:

> Thanks. I took 5 shots of different people passing and this one  
> felt the
> best for me. Strange thing, though: 5 identical framings  
> identically exposed
> on premium negative color film gave five different color renditions.
> Could this be because of the tiny time differences made by mechanical
> shutters such as on my (recently CLA'd) 4M-2?
>
>
>
>> From: Eric <ericm@pobox.com>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 17:19:49 -0500
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Catching up with the PAW: weeks 31 to 33
>>
>> Philippe:
>>
>>
>>> http://users.telenet.be/philippe.orlent/PAW2005/slides/Wk31.html
>>>
>>
>> I like.  I didn't notice the tiny person until I read Graham's  
>> comment.
>> Might be more apparent in a large print.  Very well done.
>>
>> --
>> Eric
>> http://canid.com/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Catching up with the PAW: weeks 31 to 33)
In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Catching up with the PAW: weeks 31 to 33)