Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Didn't Puts have some other article claiming that digital >was going to require really good glass? Hmmmm..... This has been exactly my own experience with digital. Lenses that works very well in the SLR didn't so much in the DSLR. I'm speaking about full frame sensor camera -the only that IMHO have sense- where wides and extreme wides if they are not the crap that non users claim have a slightly worse output than in film. Consumers zooms that worked in a sufficient way on film showed much quicker their limits in digital. There are many friends in the LUG that are using outstanding lenses made by Leica in Canon bodies with excellent results. I don't but for my laziness of losing auto everything not for the quality that is, generally, better so I cannot understand these statements of Mr.Puts about the leveling factor of the digital sensor over the high quality lenses. I have found his test of high interest however he didn't used similar type of lenses mixing primes and zooms while the former are generally better than later. But in general agree with his conclusion : a DMR has the same quality level and it's not exactly poor- with perhaps better color -that a Canon 20D and, I'll add, than a Rebel XT with a cost of less than 1.000$. Felix