Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What would you do with $200
From: cochranpr at mac.com (David Cochran)
Date: Fri Oct 21 19:48:55 2005
References: <BF7C6425.7020%bdcolen@comcast.net> <4a44bae962202e990c3cd90c2f7ae0fa@paulhardycarter.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20051020142740.038d0cd8@screengang.com> <cf017718802cf2851e83edacd5be9d4e@paulhardycarter.com> <4cfa589b0510200856v26e755bvf1678b38a18e16c9@mail.gmail.com> <435927DF.9060702@planet.nl> <850EDA62-88CA-47B1-B12B-9AA43D99E83A@mindspring.com> <13883564.1129920991171.JavaMail.cochranpr@mac.com> <6.2.1.2.0.20051021203305.244441e0@imap.duke.edu>

Hi Aaron. I did not check on waranties...you may have a point.
I did an item for item comparison on the specs at B&H and the only 
difference was that it was stated that there was threads for  
filters-not included  for the Leica while the Panasonic said Filters 
"no" So I can't even say that it has no threads. Other than that, the 
cameras are exactly the same, different wording for features.

I don't even inted to buy one. As for digital I would go for a Canon 
20D...probably by the time I have the money it would be a 30D  ;-)

For point and shoot digital I have to o with Olympus. I already own a 
C-5060 and around 8 xD cards so in order to save on storage I have to 
go with Olympus.

peace

David
On Oct 21, 2005, at 8:40 PM, Aaron Sandler wrote:

> To take you seriously for a moment, it might actually be worth the 
> extra money to some folks...
>
> I already bought the LX1 (and therefore saved the $200), but I believe 
> the Leica comes with a 3-year warrantee (vs 1 for the Panasonic) and 
> Photoshop Elements (not with the Panasonic), in addition to the red 
> dot.  If you need PSE and want the added warrantee, it might be worth 
> the extra $200.  Up to you.  There may also be slight differences in 
> the internal programming, which might result in a real functional 
> difference...don't know yet...have to wait for the Leica reviews to 
> see if that's the case.
>
> Either way, budget some $ for an extra battery and a couple of memory 
> cards.  This thing eats batteries and fills up those cards as, I 
> believe, most similar cameras do.
>
> -Aaron
>
> PS--The Panasonic version in black is very cute...If you are single 
> and don't want to be, I definitely recommend that one.  ;)
>
>
>> Hi all. This is a Leica loyalty question.
>> What would you do with $200?
>> Would you spend it in a nice chrome body with a red dot or use it for 
>> something else?
>> The Leica D-Lux 2 is comming....and so is the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX1.
>> Same cars different colors...
>> I mean, would you spend $200 for a filter screw?
>> ;-)
>> peace
>> David
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] New Apple software, Aperture)
Message from paul at paulhardycarter.com (PHC) ([Leica] New Apple software, Aperture)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] New Apple software, Aperture)
Message from paul at paulhardycarter.com (PHC) ([Leica] New Apple software, Aperture)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] New Apple software, Aperture)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] New Apple software, Aperture)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] New Apple software, Aperture)
Message from cochranpr at mac.com (David Cochran) ([Leica] What would you do with $200)
Message from aaron.sandler at duke.edu (Aaron Sandler) ([Leica] What would you do with $200)