Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] eyes...
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sat Oct 29 17:41:46 2005
References: <ce.7404f0df.30956e2e@aol.com>
 
On Oct 29, 2005, at 5:30 PM, SonC@aol.com wrote:

>
>
> In a message dated 10/29/2005 7:29:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> kididdoc@cox.net writes:
>
>
> On Oct 29, 2005, at 10:06 AM, SonC@aol.com wrote:
>
>
>> Nice  set, but I would toss 85, as it doesn't fit.
>>
>
> what?
>
> All the others are engaged with the camera, he is  not

true Sonny, but he was well aware of the camera...and his reaction to  
the camera, was, in a sense... to ignore it,  and to screwtinize the  
computer...

but I know what you mean...
:-)

Steve
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> Oldest continuous  settlement in La Louisiane
> ?galit?, libert?,  crawfish
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from cochranpr at mac.com (David Cochran) ([Leica] eyes...)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] eyes...)
 In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] eyes...)