Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] eyes...
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun Oct 30 03:30:33 2005
References: <205.d64d4c8.309585aa@aol.com> <000701c5dd0f$c17e6060$1ae76c18@ted>

the series is    .....eyes....

my series , my rules....


if Sonny wants to show in Friday flowers, a flower on a coffee mug,  
or a jet fighter.... I will look and not complain...


:-)

Steve



On Oct 29, 2005, at 10:06 PM, Ted Grant wrote:

> I stand corrected, you are right in the series as a set no question.
>
> ted
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <SonC@aol.com>
> To: <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 7:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] eyes...
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 10/29/2005 9:04:52 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> tedgrant@shaw.ca writes:
>
> Hi Sonny  & Steve,
> Sorry Sonny I'd have gone the other way, thrown all the others  out  
> and kept
> "Eyes 5" as it's the only magical photograph!  :-)
>
>
> Yeah but...He was presenting a set. that was clearly not part of  
> the  set.
> The others had a relationship; engaging the camera. I stand by my   
> edit. Save
> the single for another posting.
>
>
> Regards,
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> Oldest continuous  settlement in La Louisiane
> ?galit?, libert?,  crawfish
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] eyes...)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] eyes...)