Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/12/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] TidBits: Digital Better than Film
From: drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers)
Date: Tue Dec 13 15:28:38 2005
 
Adam,

I had to read it to the end out of curiosity. I now have a headache. 

I should have known what to expect after the first paragraph which
included the claim, "Technically, my digital photographs are at least as
good as the best conventional photographs."   

Oh really?

Not "my best" but "THE best". 

DaveR



-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Bridge [mailto:abridge@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 2:40 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: [Leica] TidBits: Digital Better than Film

Here's a link to an essay demonstrating why digital is better than film.

Especially to the point is the assertion that infinite depth of field is
superior to a limited depth of field. (It's toward the end of the
essay).


<http://www.tidbits.com/tb-issues/TidBITS-809.html#lnk7>

Enjoy!

Adam