Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/12/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: LUG Re: nikon D100
From: telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr)
Date: Sat Dec 31 18:28:25 2005

on 12/31/05 1:30 PM, Matt Powell at wooderson@gmail.com wrote:

> It's hard to fault 'digital' photography, when the part that wore out
> was mechanical (and presumably would have been in danger of failure
> with the equivalent film body).

The part would not have failed as quickly on the film body because on the
digital camera the perceived variable cost of each exposure is zero,
encouraging more frequent use of the shutter.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com



Replies: Reply from gwpics at googlemail.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] Re: LUG Re: nikon D100)
In reply to: Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] Re: LUG Re: nikon D100)