Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] still more on Leica "rumor" and NYT
From: drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers)
Date: Wed Jan 4 14:01:14 2006
 
Daniel,

Coroners, medical professionals, are usually a better source as to the
well being of individuals.     

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Ridings [mailto:dlridings@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:25 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] still more on Leica "rumor" and NYT

On 1/4/06, mcyclwritr@comcast.net <mcyclwritr@comcast.net> wrote:
> This exactly the sort of NYT apologist retort I anticipated. That's
why my original post included a whiff of Basic Reporting 101, which,
predictably, is missing from your reply.

According to Aftenposten (national newspaper in Norway) it was family
members and governor of West Virgina who reported that 12 had
survived. That's pretty close to the sources a reporter would work
with.

Daniel
Replies: Reply from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] still more on Leica "rumor" and NYT)