Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Hasselbald now digital conflicted
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Sat Jan 14 16:41:58 2006
References: <fc.233dfc85.30f9d81b@aol.com>

Sonny,
As I am probably in the market for a medium format film scanner and my
budget only goes for flatbeds; could you give reasons on Mikrotek vs Epson
4xxx vs anything else you considered?  Even if this was a University
purchase I assume you had some input.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 1/13/06, SonC@aol.com <SonC@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> In a message dated 1/13/2006 9:58:05 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> images@InfoAve.Net writes:
>
> The  ability to send digital files by
> e-mail or ftp instead of making dupes and  sending them through the
> mail has revolutionized the way that  photographers do business.
>
>
>
> Well, yes.  I still shoot film.  because I have a  cheap, stable way to
> preserve the image for a long time.  It is a  negative.
>
> But then, I can, (and have) shot an assignment on Sunday,  and delivered
> the
> images via my server, essentially on the art director's  desk Monday
> morning.
>
> Today I delivered a 688 meg image (scanned from an 8x10) to the Louisiana
> State Museum for a mural display.  The original was shot in 1978.  I  took
> the
> 8x10 and scanned it today, then placed on the server.   They have it,
> ready to
> make a mural.
>
> Whew.  I am conflicted.
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> Oldest continuous  settlement in La Louisiane
> ?galit?, libert?,  crawfish
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] Hasselbald now digital conflicted)