Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] DMR mk II ?
From: images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley)
Date: Sun Feb 5 08:40:10 2006
References: <212-SnapperMsg4EA12C31C00AFD3D@[70.194.234.15]> <43D6032A000649C3@mssbzhh-int.msg.bluewin.ch>
 
At 12:04 AM 2/5/2006, you wrote:
>BTW, I wonder why those crash- and burn- photographers who shoot
>100 pictures at 3200 ISO to get a usable one are posting here at all.
>Leica with its tradition of superior picture quality is not
>and has never been the type of camera they need.
>
>Peter

Peter -  You'd better look again at the history of Leica.  It started 
out as a camera prized by photojournalists for its durability, 
handling, size, and ability to shoot in low light.  It's still used 
by many photojournalists (when they use film) for those same reasons.

Tina

Tina Manley, ASMP
http://www.tinamanley.com
Replies: Reply from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] DMR mk II ?)
 In reply to: Message from bd_colen at harvard.edu (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] DMR mk II ?)
Message from pwerner at bluewin.ch (pwerner@bluewin.ch) ([Leica] DMR mk II ?)