Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/02/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA
From: wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell)
Date: Sun Feb 5 15:46:08 2006
References: <43E44556.2060001@gmail.com> <B9C6C3CE-2E7E-4685-B6EE-6A1FE1205BC4@pandora.be> <43E55E4F.70301@gmail.com> <15271210.1139106748845.JavaMail.s_gregory1@mac.com> <22c93b290602051052w128f1026n591b9505943269b8@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20060205212353.0313a3e0@screengang.com>
On 2/5/06, Didier Ludwig <rangefinder@screengang.com> wrote:
>
> >... neither Delta 3200 nor TMax 3200 is a true 3200-speed film.
> Matt
> What do you ecaxtly mean with "not a true 3200-speed film"? Just curious.
> Didier
However ISO is measured (I believe it's shadow density at
something-or-other blah blah blah, I don't do testing of that kind),
neither of the 3200 films is a 'true' 3200 ISO (as Tri-X is a true 400
in certain developers, etc.). TMZ or Delta3200 at 3200 is underexposed
(and then push-processed).
This is all badly explained, I'm sure.
--
MP
wooderson@gmail.com
Replies:
Reply from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
In reply to:
Message from evanowski at gmail.com (Edmund Evanowski) ([Leica] poorly framed & composed snaps?)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] poorly framed & composed snaps?)
Message from evanowski at gmail.com (Edmund Evanowski) ([Leica] poorly framed & composed snaps?)
Message from s_gregory1 at mac.com (Scott Gregory) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)