Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] silver vs pixels
From: bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce)
Date: Mon Feb 20 13:21:55 2006
References: <001901c63660$388294c0$656c0e44@newukolbqveo9i>

A fortune is to each, different ................... but if I remember  
correctly, isn't there a place called "darkroom" in N.O. who allow  
the practitioner to use their services, also for printing?

B.

On 20-feb-2006, at 21:57, Jeffery Smith wrote:

> So far, I've had two Epson digital printers. The first one was  
> expensive
> (2000P), and lasted about 30 prints before it started pooping out  
> magenta
> lines horizontally on the B&W paper. Price to repair it? $400. I  
> tossed it.
>
> The next one was an Epson 1280, which is slightly better, but ink  
> cartridges
> are nowhere to be found in this city.
>
> I may just farm out everything I want printed. As far as silver vs  
> pixels,
> the silver was far less expensive, even with the botched first tries.
>
> Is there a good B&W digital printer out there that doesn't cost a  
> fortune
> and doesn't go belly up after 30 prints?
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] silver vs pixels)