Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Feb 24, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Luis Ripoll wrote: > Hi Steve, > > I can't compare both Elmars, I have the latest. I bought it to take my > camera and a small lens on my trips, without UV and without the > shade is > really small. I appreciate the quality very good, I think it has a > special > nice contrast. > > All these pictures (or almost all) I've shot in Lisboa with the > late Elmar > 2,8/50mm: http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=462925 thank you Luis.. very helpful and I like the look of the images. Some wo0nderful photos there... some that are quite well known....Steve > > I hope this helps > > Saludos desde Barcelona > Luis > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org]En > nombre de > Steve Barbour > Enviado el: viernes, 24 de febrero de 2006 16:45 > Para: Leica Users Group > CC: MUG; LEG Group > Asunto: [Leica] 50/2.8 Elmars... > > Is there any optical difference between the old chrome 50/2.8 > collapsible Elmars of the 1950's to 1974, and the newer 50/2.8 > Elmars which were issued starting sometime in the 1990's... > > Does anyone experienced in using these lenses see any differences in > the photos from them? > > Which vintage is preferable if in good shape, and the cost not > considered? > > I appreciate your advice, Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information