Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PMA report
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Fri Mar 3 15:56:12 2006
References: <3ef1e4e3ef0996.3ef09963ef1e4e@shaw.ca> <9b678e0603022035k59fd074cled429ebd75cbf61b@mail.gmail.com> <33262E9E-C1EA-421C-BC34-B426E1B22356@mac.com>

Ken,
Yes, my concern would be for 4X5 and larger.  Although fron the sample film
in the 120 holders the DOF of the machine would have to be relatively
large.  The film buckle was visible.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 3/2/06, Kenneth Frazier <kennybod@mac.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 2, 2006, at 11:35 PM, Don Dory wrote:
>
> > My only concern would be holding larger film formats
> > flat.
>
> Don,
>
> I understand that the new scanners WILL hold 120 film flat.  Were you
> talking about larger than 120?
>
> Everything I've read about these new scanners is very encouraging.
>
> Ken
> -----------------------------------
> The Rev. Kenneth Frazier
> Connecticut Conference, United Church of Christ
> Current Leica Photography (PAW):
> http://tinyurl.com/6sc2r
>
> Current Medium Format Photos:
> http://tinyurl.com/bjvfn
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] PMA report)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] PMA report)
Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] PMA report)