Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Russian Jupiter-9 85/2 lens question
From: clzeni at mindspring.com (Craig Zeni)
Date: Mon Apr 3 07:12:09 2006
References: <380-22006413135718453@M2W110.mail2web.com>

I have a chrome one from 1956 that's nicely coated and focuses spot 
on...I bought the lens from That Guy Kyle who, if I recall, had the 
lens gone thru and tuned, possible recoated I don't recall.  But it's 
nice with butter smooth out of focus effects.

CZ
NC

On Apr 3, 2006, at 9:57 AM, durling@cox.net wrote:

> My understanding is that the black ones are later and also coated.  The
> first two numerical digits of the serial number are the year of 
> production.
> Mine is black and '74.  I had the opportunity to look over a couple in 
> the
> shop and found the black one to be nicer than the silver ones.
>
> Even though coated it does flare under certain lighting conditions, 
> and the
> focus is not perfect which is a common problem with these.  Otherwise 
> it is
> a very nice lens.
>
> Mike Durling
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Bill Smith wrs111445@yahoo.com
> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 01:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
> To: lug@leica-users.org
> Subject: [Leica] Russian Jupiter-9 85/2 lens question
>
>
> Is the silver or black one the most desirable?
>
>   Thanks,
>
>   Bill
>
>                       
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> http://mail2web.com/ .
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from wrs111445 at yahoo.com (Bill Smith) ([Leica] Russian Jupiter-9 85/2 lens question for Craig Z.)
In reply to: Message from durling at cox.net (durling@cox.net) ([Leica] Russian Jupiter-9 85/2 lens question)