Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/04/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Apr 16, 2006, at 9:13 AM, Don Dory wrote: > Doug, > Is setting the DMR at 400 and underexposing better than using a set 800 > ISO? The shot you posted looks extremely good at the size you posted, > do > you see any artifacts at any reasonable viewing size? > > Don > don.dory@gmail.com > > > On 4/16/06, Douglas Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> wrote: >> >> These have been migrating through here recently; one of their favorite >> refueling points is the almond tree outside my office window: >> >> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/parulidae/yrwa01.html >> >> technical stuff: R8/DMR, 560 f/6.8+ extension tube, ISO 400 >> underexposed 1 stop & pushed in processing >> >> All comments welcome >> Don, This was mostly a trial of David Young's suggestion for better noise control at higher ISO. Since there aren't any areas of deep shadows in this picture I don't think this was an adequate test of the technique; with this in mind I don't see any significant noise artifacts in this picture. Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com