Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?
From: jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Thu May 11 18:53:26 2006
References: <30461819.1147361644178.JavaMail.root@centrmwml03.mgt.cox.net> <"c eb1a5650605110837md5e9639yeb7ccfcb26a84866"@mail.gmail.com> <446362BE.4050408@eth.net> <44637B46.7060506@waltjohnson.com> <"a2f8f4470605111101i7310098bo804370e084c7 dfc3"@mail.gmail.com> <44638140.8010805@waltjohnson.com>

The Nikon 50mm f1.4 is a very good lens, as is the f1.8, which should be 
available new for less than US$100. Makes the Leica prices on a 
cost/benefit basis somewhat extravagant, to say the least. I am 
surprised that Zeiss has taken on two of Nikon's best lenses as their 
initial offerings....
Cheers
Jayanand

 lensesWalt Johnson wrote:

> I managed to learn one of two things during  years of buying and using 
> Nikon gear. Found I'd rather shoot 1/30 @ f2 than 1/60 @ f1.4. Not 
> only did I have more money for film, I had a lens with fewer aberrations.
>
> Walt
>
> Daniel Ridings wrote:
>
>> About 6 months ago I couldn't pass one up (the pre-AI version) for 30
>> dollars. Kind of fun to play with. Makes me sympathize with those who
>> want their 1.4 Summiluxes.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 5/11/06, Walt Johnson <walt@waltjohnson.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I just bought a used (but new in box) Nikkor AIS 50mm 1.4 for 70
>>> dollars.  ;-)
>>>
>>> Walt
>>>
>>> Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
>>>
>>> > Mark,
>>> > You must be joking!!
>>> >
>>> > B&H prices:
>>> >
>>> > 50mm f1.4AIS  Nikkor is US$300 US Guarantee.(ithe AF version will be
>>> > cheaper)
>>> > 50mm Summicron-M is US$1495 US Guarantee.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers
>>> > Jayanand
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Mark Langer wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> In that case, I'm surprised that the ubiquitous Jupiter 3 50mm f1.5
>>> >> hasn't
>>> >> come up, which is a lot of lens for the money.  Or the Nikkor 
>>> 50mm f1.4,
>>> >> although with that lens you are getting into the Summicron price 
>>> range.
>>> >>
>>> >> On 5/11/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I laid out the criteria in the original email posting. I guess I 
>>> was
>>> >>> looking for "best" as the one lens that could be the best 
>>> compromise of
>>> >>> features, like D76 and Tri-X, rather than the best at doing one 
>>> thing.
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Jeffery
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Leica Users Group.
>>> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Leica Users Group.
>>> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>



In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)