Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Fri May 12 12:59:48 2006
References: <005e01c675fb$4a241e80$0202a8c0@acer81080ea37f>

Well hush my mouth and call me Rastus. I thought that was a type of lens 
aberration one tried to avoid. Now, it seems as if I'll have to go by 
some new lenses until I find one with the right kind of bokeh. What else 
will I have to do to class myself as a "bokeh buff"?

Walt

Steve Unsworth wrote:

>As the man once said 'if you have to ask you'll never know'.
>
>Here's what I - and I don't normally class myself as a 'bokeh buff' - would
>class as being at the very least 'odd'.
>
>http://www.leica-camera.com/discus_e/messages/11/212254.jpg
>
>Canon 5D, 250mm Telyt.
>
>Steve
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lug-bounces+lug=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org
>[mailto:lug-bounces+lug=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>Marc James Small
>Sent: 11 May 2006 21:43
>To: Leica Users Group
>Subject: Re: [Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?
>
>At 08:34 PM 5/11/06 +0100, Colin J wrote:
>
>  
>
>>2) Bokeh
>>    
>>
>
>...It cannot be qauantified and therefore is not an issue. 
>
>  
>

In reply to: Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] What's the Best All-Around 50?)