Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Dumb Rodinal Question
From: jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Sat May 20 19:53:50 2006

Well, they are drying now. I used a 1:50 dilution for 12 min, and the
negatives look plenty dense. I guess it's true that Rodinal DOES have a
shelf life of a century. That bottle has to be 4 years old, and it came out
looking a bit like soy sauce. I would expect Tri-X in Rodinal to be
grainville, but I keep seeing wonderful shots with that combo.

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com




-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Walt
Johnson
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 9:39 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Dumb Rodinal Question


That's right Jeffery:

Jeffery Smith wrote:

>I haven't used Rodinal in years, so bear with me. When the massive 
>development chart calls for 1+25 dilution of Rodinal, it means that 1 
>ml of the Rodinal "full strength, right out of the bottle" is mixed 
>with 25ml water, correct? There is no intermediate "working solution" 
>like there is in HC110, correct?
>
>Jeffery Smith
>New Orleans, LA
>http://www.400tx.com
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>  
>


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Dumb Rodinal Question)
In reply to: Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Dumb Rodinal Question)