Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Digital M Principle
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Mon Jun 5 17:48:39 2006
References: <470.29a8990.31b2f6b3@aol.com> <006401c688b5$7db57560$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto>

Or the availability of truly first class fast glass at all focal lengths to
90mm.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 6/5/06, Christopher Williams <leicachris@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> Hmmmmm......why switch from my non full frame Nikons(D2h,D1x,D100) to a
> smaller lighter non-full frame digital Leica?
>
> I'd personally like to take off the pounds. If you have the lightweight
> D70
> I'd guess you would not really care.
>
> Chris
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Afterswift@aol.com>
>
> Subject: [Leica] Digital M Principle
>
>
>
> > To sever film from digital in the digital M body breaks the logic of
> using
> > the Leica system because it destroys the crossover Leica users expect.
> The
> > framing should remain mechanical for reliability and the conservation of
> power, in
> > addition to the universal compatibility of Leica lenses.
> >
> > For that matter, producing a digital M using anything but a true 24x36mm
> > revolutionary sensor would be a huge mistake. Why would I switch from
> the
> Nikon
> > D70 to a digital M in that case? Leica Solms should be warned against
> producing
> > a pseudo, premature digital M. We won't bite, methinks. Maybe collectors
> would
> > buy that animal. But collectors won't make Leica successful. Only a
> has-been.
> >
> > Bob R
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from Afterswift at aol.com (Afterswift@aol.com) ([Leica] Digital M Principle)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: Digital M Principle)