Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] question...
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Thu Jun 8 10:15:03 2006
References: <18900783.1149779912499.JavaMail.root@fepweb04>

I kinda like his work. But it's certainly not better than what is  
shown on this list.


Op 8-jun-06, om 17:18 heeft <allen.graves@charter.net> het volgende  
geschreven:

> After looking at his web page, Mr. JS certainly seems eminently  
> qualified to comment on "lousy" -or at least undistinguished-  
> photographs. He seems to be a master of the genre. Perhaps he  
> excuses this by thinking that they would be better if he had a more  
> expensive camera. <grin>
>
> Allen
>
>
> ---- SonC@aol.com wrote:
>> In a message dated 6/8/2006 9:43:10 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
>> kididdoc@cox.net writes:
>> actually I wonder who said this ""  ""   Don ?
>>
>> "There is a Leica user's forum on the Internet that has the  amazing
>> combination of lousy photos taken with very expensive cameras  and
>> praise for the lousy photos."
>>
>>
>> thanks, Steve
>> -------------------
>>
>> It was on the photo forum at  Nabble
>>
>>
>> Re: The death of photo industry - Was Pentax are seeing the  light
>> by Jeff Spirer 2006-05-29 13:06 :: Reply | Show Only this   
>> Message :: Rate
>> this Message:
>> At 10:37 AM 5/29/2006,  Qkano wrote:
>>
>>> And professional photgraphers too.
>>> Now anyone,  even a monkey, can buy a digital camera and produce  
>>> images
>>> better than  were ever possible with film.
>>
>> If that's true, it's a good thing.   The history of photography is  
>> its
>> place as a democratizing art - Kodak  recognized this with the
>> original box camera, roll film took a huge leap  forward, and  
>> minilabs
>> took it as far as it could before digital.   Digital is just another
>> step in the process rather than some disconnect.
>>
>>> BTW: this is meant seriously, I'm becoming more and more aghast at
>>> images I'm shown as "great" - even in company advertising  
>>> brochures -
>>> which most here would consign to the bin. The people praising them
>>> really do seem to believe they are great.  There must be something
>>> deeply human ...
>>
>> Very true, but disconnected from the  technology, except the
>> technology available to see so much more than  before.  There is a
>> Leica user's forum on the Internet that has the  amazing combination
>> of lousy photos taken with very expensive cameras and  praise for the
>> lousy photos.
>>
>>
>> Jeff Spirer
>> Photos:  http://www.spirer.com
>> One People: http://www.onepeople.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sonny
>> http://www.sonc.com
>> Natchitoches,  Louisiana
>> Oldest continuous settlement in La Louisiane
>> ?galit?, libert?,  crawfish
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



Replies: Reply from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] question...)
Reply from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] question...)
In reply to: Message from allen.graves at charter.net (allen.graves@charter.net) ([Leica] question...)