Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: 135 mm lens
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Fri Jul 28 15:47:50 2006

Thanks, Larry. Ill be sure to read up on that one.
Nothing wrong with lenses with lots of heavy glass in them. And no plastic.

Regards,
Hoppy 

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Lawrence Zeitlin
Sent: Saturday, 29 July 2006 08:29
To: lug@leica-users.org
Subject: [Leica] Re: 135 mm lens


On Jul 28, 2006, at 12:13 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote:

> From: "H. Ball Arche" <h_arche@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] basic older M lens question
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Message-ID: <20060728040427.10449.qmail@web55912.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Totally an opinion here, but I think the best solution
> for an occasional-use 135 is to get an LTM to M
> adaptor, and go to the auction site and look for an
> old Canon Serenar. It'll be break-your-back heavy, but
> wonderfully sharp, sturdy, and inexpensive. Check out
> the old LTM Nikkors too. You can usually pick up a
> nice one for US$80-90; or at least I did 2 years ago.
> Check out Gandy's site in the screw-mount users lens
> guide.
> Arche
>
> --- G Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
>> Folks, pardon the basic question.
>>
>> I'm looking at getting an inexpensive 135mm for
>> occasional use on my M6 .85.
>>
>> I've read a little but am still unsure on some
>> mechanics regarding which
>> ones have the detachable mount or require the viso?
>> system.
>>
>> Herr Putt's review of the f4 Elmar 135 has nary a
>> word on any adaptor
>> requirement.
>>
>> The lens I have inquired about is currently in our
>> FS from a member in
>> Singapore.
>>
>> It's listed as M mount. I have no idea as yet
>> regarding whether it works
>> normally on my M or requires the adaptor system.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for setting me straight
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Hoppy
>>

I totally agree with Arche. I've been using a 135 mm f3.5 Canon Serenar 
lens on my M3 for the last 20 years. It is a wonderfully sharp short 
telephoto. The lens itself is a four element design with the cemented 
center element a very large and solid block of glass. That's why the 
lens is so heavy. The weight tends to minimize camera shake. At least 
that's what I keep telling myself.

If you buy a Canon 135 mm lens, try to get one of the later versions in 
a black anodized body. These were intended for the later model Canon RF 
cameras and allegedly perform better than the earlier chromed lenses. 
The Leica 35 mm adaptor activates the 135 mm frame line on my M3. I 
don't know about the M6.

Larry Z


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] Re: 135 mm lens)
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: 135 mm lens)