Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Another Altered Photo...
From: csemetko at earthlink.net (Craig Semetko)
Date: Mon Aug 7 10:53:35 2006
References: <200608071741.k77Hd3OL020581@server1.waverley.reid.org>

Yes, B.D., the Turnleys are twins, so the photographer couldn't have 
been Peter either.

Craig

On Aug 7, 2006, at 10:41 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote:

> Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:27:44 -0400
> From: "B. D. Colen" <bd@bdcolenphoto.com>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Another Altered Photo
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Message-ID: <C0FCF050.13784%bd@bdcolenphoto.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;     charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Wait - Aren't David and Peter twins?
>
>
> On 8/7/06 1:25 PM, "Walt Johnson" <walt@waltjohnson.com> wrote:
>
>> I was trying to remember who the fellow was? His brother?
>>
>> Walt
>>
>> Craig Semetko wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Walt,
>>>
>>> I may be wrong, but I don't think David Turnley missed the shot--he
>>> was 16 in 1972 when the shot was taken...
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> NO ARCHIVE
>>>


Replies: Reply from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo...)
Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Another Altered Photo...)