Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Digital image longevity
From: nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Wed Aug 16 22:08:23 2006
References: <200608141445.k7EEj3NT012551@server1.waverley.reid.org> <"E7BF209C -C607-4133-A671-E11CFD537F3B"@optonline.net> <CA4AEDFEA9897ADFE7194E2E@scarborough.isc.org> <"44E2AA6A.500 0801"@nathanfoto.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20060816102017.026dce08@infoave.net> <44E384AF.80401@nathanfoto.com> <44E3E837.7000607@eth.net>

But then I wonder why all the archival DVDs I see out there are of the 
-R variety.

Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
> Tina,
>
> If remember right, DVD+R is more accurate, and thus better for non 
> volatile archiving (music,film,data,photos), and DVD-R is better for 
> compatibility, i.e.,it will play on most stand alone DVD players...
>
> Cheers
> Jayanand
>
> Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>
>> Thanks Tina, I will look into that. Or perhaps I will just start 
>> using the Powerbook to burn the DVDs--I think it is agnostic w.r.t. 
>> plus or minus.
>>
>> Nathan
>>
>> Tina Manley wrote:
>>
>>> At 01:17 AM 8/16/2006, you wrote:
>>>
>>>> Related question: how come all the archival DVD's I see are of the 
>>>> -R variety (like the Kodak ones on this web site)? My burner uses 
>>>> DVD+R discs (at least the burner I have in my desktop PC, I am not 
>>>> sure whether my Powerbook takes both flavors). Is there something 
>>>> about the minus vs. the plus that makes it easier to produce 
>>>> archival DVDs?
>>>>
>>>> Nathan
>>>
>>>
>>> Nathan -  My built-in DVD burner uses +R, too, so I bought an 
>>> external DVD burner so I could use -R.  I've read that -R is more 
>>> reliable and those who submit to Alamy on DVDs say that the error 
>>> rate with -R is much less than with +R.  I don't think I'd trust +R 
>>> as much for archival use.
>>>
>>> Tina
>>>
>>> Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
>>> http://www.tinamanley.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>

-- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH, BUY DANISH PRODUCTS!

General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com

Stock photography: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman
http://myloupe.com/home/found_photographer.php?photographer=507
Prints for sale: http://www.photodeluge.com

Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



Replies: Reply from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)
In reply to: Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Re: Digital image longevity)