Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Daniel, That Leica glow is fantastic on your daughter and wife, or maybe they just glow. Good to see another shot of your son looking only mildly perturbed thea you are taking another picture and why aren't you done yet. Gasp, you have cars and parking lots where you live. In all your years of posting, I think the only cars I have seen were on some of your 21mm shots on your walk to work a couple of years ago. Good test of flare resistance anyway. Don don.dory@gmail.com On 8/27/06, Daniel Ridings <dlridings@gmail.com> wrote: > > Right before I left for my trip I bid and won on a defective 90/4.0 > Elmar on the auction place. It was a black one and I was warned that > it would need cleaning. It cost less than $35 so I did it more or less > on a chance. > > It was waiting for me when I got back and looked as desribed. I took > it apart and cleaned it, but couldn't get the stains in the coating > off on one of the inner elements. > > One thing led to another and I ended up with an Elmar for the M as > well (the lense cost about the same as an LTM->M adapter would have). > The 90 Elmars are pretty cheap. Probably for good reasons: > > http://www.dlridings.se/paw/2006/34.html > > The screwmount one is represented here: > > http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v34/06v34-0002.jpg.html > > The shoebox with other samples: > > http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v34/ > > All Tri-X and HC110. > > Daniel > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >