Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have a 90/4 M-Rokkor myself and like it alot, so I don't see a reason why it should be cheap, although it was (bought it from Nathan 2 years ago). Thanks for showing, Philippe Op 27-aug-06, om 12:21 heeft Daniel Ridings het volgende geschreven: > Right before I left for my trip I bid and won on a defective 90/4.0 > Elmar on the auction place. It was a black one and I was warned that > it would need cleaning. It cost less than $35 so I did it more or less > on a chance. > > It was waiting for me when I got back and looked as desribed. I took > it apart and cleaned it, but couldn't get the stains in the coating > off on one of the inner elements. > > One thing led to another and I ended up with an Elmar for the M as > well (the lense cost about the same as an LTM->M adapter would have). > The 90 Elmars are pretty cheap. Probably for good reasons: > > http://www.dlridings.se/paw/2006/34.html > > The screwmount one is represented here: > > http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v34/06v34-0002.jpg.html > > The shoebox with other samples: > > http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v34/ > > All Tri-X and HC110. > > Daniel > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >