[Leica] PAW 34 dlridings

[dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)]

Ah ... the Rokkor and Elmars for the CLs are different beasts,
Philippe. I was looking at a Rokkor for the M, but it cost 3 times as
much as the old Elmar and since I have a Tele-Elmarit, this extra 90
was more of a nonsensical purchase than a "need".

I have heard great things about the Rokkors and Elmars for the CL.

Daniel


On 8/27/06, Philippe Orlent <philippe.orlent@pandora.be> wrote:
> I have a 90/4 M-Rokkor myself and like it alot, so I don't see a
> reason why it should be cheap, although it was (bought it from Nathan
> 2 years ago).
> Thanks for showing,
> Philippe
>
>
> Op 27-aug-06, om 12:21 heeft Daniel Ridings het volgende geschreven:
>
> > Right before I left for my trip I bid and won on a defective 90/4.0
> > Elmar on the auction place. It was a black one and I was warned that
> > it would need cleaning. It cost less than $35 so I did it more or less
> > on a chance.
> >
> > It was waiting for me when I got back and looked as desribed. I took
> > it apart and cleaned it, but couldn't get the stains in the coating
> > off on one of the inner elements.
> >
> > One thing led to another and I ended up with an Elmar for the M as
> > well (the lense cost about the same as an LTM->M adapter would have).
> > The 90 Elmars are pretty cheap. Probably for good reasons:
> >
> > http://www.dlridings.se/paw/2006/34.html
> >
> > The screwmount one is represented here:
> >
> > http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v34/06v34-0002.jpg.html
> >
> > The shoebox with other samples:
> >
> > http://www.dlridings.se/gallery/v/shoebox/2006v34/
> >
> > All Tri-X and HC110.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>