Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PAW 32 - Possibly not one for Ted ;-)
From: bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen)
Date: Sat Sep 9 11:15:43 2006

It is in fact being advertised at this point, Don. I don't think there's any
question it's coming, and I don't really give a rat's butt whether or not it
makes a dent in the Epson base - I don't own HP stock, I'm just looking for
the best printer for the money. But that aside, we're not talking about
something like an established camera user base, where people have thousands
and thousands invested in  a lens system. We're talking about a printer, and
people replace printers at the drop of a hat, especially when we're talking
about the $600-900 printer market, not the multi-thousand oversize printer
market.


On 9/8/06 9:53 PM, "Don Dory" <don.dory@gmail.com> wrote:

> B.D.
> HP has been promising and promising.  I hope they will pull an AMD but 
> won't
> hold my breath.  The installed base for Epson is huge and the results are
> extremely good.  Now, if the ink prices were a lot more reasonable then I
> think that interesting market share shifts might happen.
> 
> Don
> don.dory@gmail.com
> 
> 
> On 9/8/06, B. D. Colen <bd@bdcolenphoto.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Me, I'm waiting for the HP B9180, which previews suggest will blow the
>> 2400
>> away....Due any day now...
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/8/06 8:46 PM, "G Hopkinson" <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>> 
>>> Peter, that's a whole other thread right there.
>>> I'm saving for the Epson 2400
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Hoppy
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org
>>> [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf
>> Of
>>> Peter Dzwig
>>> Sent: Saturday, 9 September 2006 09:39
>>> To: Leica Users Group
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] PAW 32 - Possibly not one for Ted ;-)
>>> 
>>> Thanks Hoppy, glad that you like it. I have one or two prints that I
>> made with
>>> existing kit and they set me wondering about new printers... ;-)
>>> 
>>> Peter
>>> 
>>> G Hopkinson wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Well now I know who Joseph Lily is and I've seen a great picture.
>>>> Crying out for a fine art print.
>>>> My kind of crop, a terrific image
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Hoppy
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org
>>>> [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf
>>> Of
>>>> Peter Dzwig
>>>> Sent: Saturday, 9 September 2006 08:48
>>>> To: LUG@leica-users.org
>>>> Subject: [Leica] PAW 32 - Possibly not one for Ted ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> PAW 32 - Joseph Lily in full sunlight.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/PeterDzwig/album347/JosephLilyKH200608-crop2
>>>> .jpg.html
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Leica M3 9cm CV Apo-Lanthar Kodak BW400CN 1/500@f22.
>>>> 
>>>> Just saved the highlights.
>>>> 
>>>> Comments are as always welcome.
>>>> 
>>>> Peter Dzwig
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] PAW 32 - Possibly not one for Ted ;-))
Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] PAW 32 - Possibly not one for Ted ;-))
Reply from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] PAW 32 - Possibly not one for Ted ;-))
In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] PAW 32 - Possibly not one for Ted ;-))