Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: the dynamic range of digital
From: bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen)
Date: Tue Sep 19 19:58:35 2006

Being the digital expert you are, Doug, I would have thought that you'd know
that by under exposing a stop, you're throwing away everything at the top
end of the range - in the highlights - not the shadows - and 20% of the data
is in that top stop. But I don't use a DMR, so of course I know nothing
about digital ;-) - so don't listen to me, but do try reading this...from
the Luminous Landscape site....

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/expose-right.shtml


> In my experience with the DMR, setting exposure comp to -.5 or -1
> sacrifices very little deep shadow detail if any.  It's not what I'd
> call a 20% loss of data.  The histogram (yes it's RGB) is nowhere near
> clipping at either end aside from specular highlights.  Perhaps B.D.'s
> 20% estimate is based on his experience with the E-1?
> 
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re: the dynamic range of digital)
Reply from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Re: the dynamic range of digital)
Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Re: the dynamic range of digital)
In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re: the dynamic range of digital)