Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 28-90 vario
From: sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner)
Date: Thu Oct 12 04:17:36 2006
References: <000c01c6ed9a$cf9b8460$5925e448@D1S9FY41> <49582.203.193.194.10.1160628580.squirrel@webmail.ncable.net.au>
 
If it is the early 28-90, that is accurate, Alastair. That said, I owned a
28-90 and it produced quite acceptable images throughout the focal length 
reange.

seth



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alastair Firkin" <firkin@ncable.net.au>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:49 AM
Subject: [Leica] 28-90 vario


> Someone told me the 28 -90 zoom was clearly inferior to the 35 to 70:
> anyone have a comment? I was going to test one against the other before
> selling the 35 to 70.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Alastair
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] 28-90 vario)
 In reply to: Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] LHSA meeting in Wetzlar; Leica Camera AG)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] 28-90 vario)