Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think it is the later version, but I suppose I should shut up test it and decide ;-) Cheers On 12/10/2006, at 21:17, Seth Rosner wrote: > If it is the early 28-90, that is accurate, Alastair. That said, I > owned a > 28-90 and it produced quite acceptable images throughout the focal > length reange. > > seth > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alastair Firkin" > <firkin@ncable.net.au> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> > Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:49 AM > Subject: [Leica] 28-90 vario > > >> Someone told me the 28 -90 zoom was clearly inferior to the 35 to 70: >> anyone have a comment? I was going to test one against the other >> before >> selling the 35 to 70. >> >> Cheers >> >> >> Alastair >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information