Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/10/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] M8 and the Future
From: bwdaly at gmail.com (brad daly)
Date: Mon Oct 30 19:49:52 2006
References: <001d01c6fa88$015aec30$6601a8c0@dcpdc.dcts.org> <20061031010312.83527.qmail@web50106.mail.yahoo.com> <22c93b290610301706ycede2f3w654b7bb5c1651445@mail.gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.0.20061030193137.01a233f8@northcoastphotos.com>
i realize the use of 35mm film is largely arbitrary for the reasons
previously stated. but isn't there something about the 2:3 aspect
ration that's considered desirable from a geometrical POV?
--brad
Replies:
Reply from ken at iisaka.org (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
In reply to:
Message from rclark01 at comcast.net (Robert Clark) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from rhaightjr at yahoo.com (Bob Haight) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)
Message from datamaster at northcoastphotos.com (Gary Todoroff) ([Leica] M8 and the Future)