Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] three...
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Wed Nov 8 17:15:21 2006
References: <532BF1A3-3399-4CBF-876B-3AE46CF62589@cox.net>
 
Now Steve, there aren't any more photographically inclined  here than 
you are. That is a fact.....

Walt
Steve Barbour wrote:

> either in spite of, or because of,  its faults.... I like this image...
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/three.jpg.html
>
>
> I just go by my gut, but I'm wondering if others more  
> photographically inclined may have helpful comments...
>
> thanks for looking,
>
> and your thoughts,
>
> Steve
>  
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] three...)
 In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] three...)