Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 09/11/2006, at 16:36, G Hopkinson wrote: > Alastair, actually there's a clue in your response. "I often went > to bed happy and woke up > miserable as all the images I'd printed would look "cast" in the > morning". You very likely viewed the print (or monitor) under > different lighting conditions. Unless you have a calibrated viewing > light (area) colour is always going to be subjective and > influenced by outside factors. Pardon me if I'm stating the > bleeding obvious. Interesting point that I hadn't considered before is > that digital capture is more like colour neg regarding subjective > colour, although probably more tranny like regarding exposure? > Now regarding Tina's samples, Tina has sampled the white sail area > in each, setting that as nearly pure white, that is the three > channels each close to the maximum value. Those values being equal > or close, there is little or no colour cast in the highlights. > Ideally you could perform the same channel neutralising for the > black point and mid grey (if you can select a mid grey point in the > file). Yeah, I know what went wrong, but no matter how hard you try, colour is always different. Its not science, its gut feeling > I agree, regarding the colour temperature of the samples. To my > eye, the acr version is warmer (appears more yellow) and the Phase > One cooler (more bluish). My view would be that correcting either > to taste would not be difficult. Not at all surprising that each > prog has interpreted the file differently. Really I think that the > major difference is in saturation. On my (calibrated) monitor the > Phase One example appears over saturated. More importantly, as Tina > said, I think both progs have done a creditable job and produced > very usable files that can be adjusted, just as any image with good > tonal range and resolution can be. There is a whole other thread > probably regarding the bit depth of those DNGs. It makes a big > difference very likely, when you start messing with the tonal range. I may have them the wrong way around. When I make colour images for the gallery (my hallway!!!) I always make them in one batch so the "flavour" stays the same for the whole exhibition. Mixing colour images is very difficult, and so I leave that to Helen ;-) Cheers Alastair