Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8 magenta problems - Leica offer a solution
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Thu Nov 9 05:29:24 2006
References: <EB069654-2966-40E2-A4EA-BDEE715E0179@steveunsworth.co.uk><016a01c703af$84c26140$6401a8c0@FrankDell2> <440b792d0611081943l3414dd09p52f2eab42efbecfa@mail.gmail.com>

Not just the D2h, other dSLR's do the same with certain kinds of clothing.

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "mehrdad" <msadat@gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] M8 magenta problems - Leica offer a solution


> nikon d2h also had thiskind of problems and people used hot filters to
> fix the problems it only happend once in a while and in certaian
> conditions just like the m8
>
> On 11/8/06, Frank Filippone <red735i@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Here is a shorter link ...
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/y4b54n
> >
> > The strange issue on this filter thing is this statement by Leica....
> >
> > " The filter is supplied as an accessory with a special firmware
adjustment, which will be available shortly after the planned
> > market launch of the camera at the end of November 2006.
> >
> > The IR/UV filter is only suitable for use with digital M cameras and
6-bit coded lenses."
> >
> > V1.whatever of the firmware is now scheduled for November.....
> >
> > Why is a coded lens required to get any effect at all?  Is this
marketing BS or is the coding really doing something in the camera
> > firmware?  Or the download SW?  VERY interesting......
> >
> > And finally, pure Marketing BS:
> > " The use of the additional IR filter in front of the optical system has
big advantages, as the filter does not create reflections
> > inside the optical system. This enables the reproduction of the finest
tonal values even in shadows."
> >
> > The statements I have quoted are from the WEB page noted.  The whole
thing may be false, badly or wrongly interpreted, or just plain
> > true.  Only if Leica comes out with an official statement will we be
sure.... but I certainly hope the BS statement is
> > misquoted.....  It reminds me of Intel when their Pentium (?) processor
had a multiplication error, and they kept saying it was not
> > important.... then had to replace all the processors to get the heat off
their backs.....
> >
> > Frank Filippone
> > red735i@earthlink.net
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
> --
>   -------------------------------------
>   regards, mehrdad
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] M8 magenta problems - Leica offer a solution)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] M8 magenta problems - Leica offer a solution)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] M8 magenta problems - Leica offer a solution)