Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I am very interested to hear you say this, as everyone went the other way last time I was in scanning mode. I have not had huge success with the roll film adaptor. I thought it was going to be my most used attachment: I would develop the film scan all 40 image (just like that ;-) ) and then review them before taking the 'winners' out to the darkroom for printing: BUT dust was a disaster. By the time I had scanned the 40 shots I had more dust than I had ever encountered before in the darkroom, so I had to reverse my plan: print first scan latter: which of course meant I had already cut up the rolls in strips of 5 or 6. Ah the best laid plans. On 16/11/2006, at 1:15, David Keenan wrote: > In my opinion Vuescan is an unnecessarily complex and obtuse piece of > software. It is definitely not something for a scanning and/or PC > novice. > Way too many poorly explained options. > > The Nikon scanning software is much easier to understand -- and it > works > much better and much more automatically handles the positioning of > film > strips fed into it for scanning. This is especially true if you > have the > roll film adapter as I do. > > Dave. > -- > My Photography: http://www.david-keenan.com > My Blog: http://www.david-keenan.com/euroblog > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information