Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] chimping, now Leica Sins
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Thu Nov 16 09:57:20 2006
References: <1558210889.1163693230162.JavaMail.root@fepweb09>

Allen

I bought 2 within the last couple of years. An older non-AI for $50 in 
excellent condition and a late 55 2.8 for less than $100. The 2.8 was 
like new in the box

Walt

allen.graves@charter.net wrote:

>It is really remarkable how little interest there is in some of the really 
>high quality manual focus SLR lenses there is now. A like-new Nikkor 55mm f 
>2.8 micro sat on my local shop's shelf for over 6 months for $135 before 
>someone finally bought it. I just couldn't convince myself that I needed 
>another one.
>
>Allen
>
>
>---- David Rodgers <drodgers@casefarms.com> wrote: 
>  
>
>>Walt,
>>
>>Kodak used a close up of the back of an opened Rolex used in various
>>brochures to promote the high resolution and acutance of Tech Pan. I
>>don't know if anyone recalls the image, but it was ubiquitous in the
>>Kodak literature in the 80's. 
>>
>>It was an impressive image and it stuck out in my mind. Years ago I
>>happened to mention it in the Compuserve Photo Forum. I got a private
>>response from member of the forum. He worked for Kodak and he'd taken
>>the photo. Everything was standard, including exposure, development,
>>etc. There was no special tweaking done by Kodak, IOW. He said the lens
>>used was a 55/2.8 Nikkor.  
>>
>>A couple of years back I sold my 55/2.8 to buy a 60 AF. I sort of regret
>>it, even though my reasoning was sound. The 60 metered on my D100 and
>>the 55 didn't. 
>>
>>The 60 is no slouch, but I have a special fondness for the 55. It was a
>>very versatile lens. Probably better at infinity than the 60, and equal
>>up close. I had the extension tube so I could still go 1:1 with the 55. 
>>
>>I've always liked close up photography (and many years ago made my
>>living photographing insects). I got into the R system for the express
>>reason of getting a 100 APO macro. Oddly I never acquired one. If I get
>>back into the R system it will be to use that lens. 
>>
>>daveR 
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Walt Johnson [mailto:walt@waltjohnson.com] 
>>Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 8:31 AM
>>To: Leica Users Group
>>Subject: Re: [Leica] chimping, now Leica Sins
>>
>>Slobodan
>>
>>Years ago, I did the same thing. Enjoyed copying artwork much more than 
>>setting up remotes for shuttle launches. I'm curious as to your methods 
>>since my experience with the 55 Micro Nikkor was fine.  I used tungsten 
>>light and film exclusively, after trying several other procedures. If I 
>>had to choose one camera and lens to own, my choice would be a Nikon 
>>with that 55mm.
>>
>>Walt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>    
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>

In reply to: Message from allen.graves at charter.net (allen.graves@charter.net) ([Leica] chimping, now Leica Sins)