Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The 17-35 rocks. And it works on my F5. Len On Nov 17, 2006, at 10:58 AM, David Rodgers wrote: > Chris, > > Because you say the 17-35 is slower than the 15-55 I assume you're > referring to focusing speed (they're both f2.8 lenses). I meant > slow max > aperture compared to an f2 or f1.4 lens (or a Noct). > > The 17-55 is a great, I agree. I use mine a lot, most of the time in > program mode. I can jack up the ISO on my D200 and make it usable > in low > light, but I rarely pay attention to DOF. When I use fast > (aperture-wise) lenses I'm always acutely aware for DOF and often use > them for that reason, even when there's plenty of light. I may use a > lens at f1.4 and f2 at 1/500. I'm also more concerned with DOF in BW > than I am with color photography. > > I'll go out on a limb and say that the Nikkor 17-35/2.8 AF may be the > best WA zoom available from any manufacturer. I don't own one but a > friend of mine does. We compared the 17-35 and 17-55 DX with dozens of > tests shots of various (difficult) scenes using a tripod mounted > D2x. We > also compared them to several primes. The whole exercise made me a > believer in zooms, in the Nikon digital world at least. Both performed > above my expectations. There was one instance where the 17-35 looked > like it performed better than the 17-55. It was a very challenging > architectural shot. The difference was in the corner of the frame, had > to do with chromatic aberration. Again, it was very slight. It's > hardly > worth mentioning other than to say it made the 17-35 the winner, > optically. OTOH, I could own either and I still choose the 17-55 DX. > > DaveR > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Williams [mailto:leicachris@worldnet.att.net] > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 9:26 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: [Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today > > Wait............ your 17-55/2.8 DX lens is slow??? Come on, that lens > rocks, > speed style heavy metal. 80% of my work comes from that lens. > > And it's smaller than the slower 17-35/2.8 AF. > > Chris > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information